| 239 | 2 | 146 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
目的 系统评价骨折联络服务(FLS)在脆性骨折患者中的应用效果。方法 检索PubMed、Web of Science、中国知网、万方和维普数据库中2014年1月1日—2023年12月30日关于FLS对脆性骨折患者进行干预的相关文献。采用偏倚风险评估工具2.0和渥太华评价量表分别对随机对照研究和观察性研究进行偏倚风险评价和质量评价。最后,基于数据质量评估,使用RevMan5.4分析软件进行Meta分析。结果 本研究共纳入24篇文献,总计18 558例脆性骨折患者。Meta分析结果显示,FLS可以缓解脆性骨折患者的疼痛(SMD=-1.25,95%CI:-1.39~-1.12,P<0.05)、降低二次骨折发生率(RR=0.60,95%CI:0.48~0.75,P<0.05)、减少病死率(RR=0.86,95%CI:0.80~0.93,P<0.05)、提高骨质疏松确诊率(RR=2.24,95%CI:1.74~2.87,P<0.05)、改善生活质量(SMD=10.34,95%CI:7.26~13.42,P<0.05)。结论 FLS有助缓解脆性骨折患者的疼痛,降低二次骨折风险,减少病死率,提高脆性骨折患者骨质疏松的确诊率,提升患者的整体生活质量。
Abstract:Objective A systematic analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy of fracture liaison services(FLS) in patients with fragility fractures. Methods Literature related to FLS intervention in fragility fracture patients was searched from PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang and VIP databases from January 1, 2014 to December 30, 2023. The Bias Risk Assessment Tool 2. 0 and the Ottawa Assessment Scale were used to evaluate the risk of bias in randomized controlled studies and observational studies. Finally, based on data quality assessment, meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5. 4 analysis software. Results A total of 18 558 patients with fragility fractures were included in 24 studies. Meta-analysis results showed that FLS can relieve pain in patients with fragility fractures(SMD=-1. 25, 95% CI:-1. 39--1. 12, P<0. 05), reduce the incidence of secondary fractures(RR=0. 60, 95% CI: 0. 48-0. 75, P<0. 05), reduce mortality(RR=0. 86, 95% CI: 0. 80-0. 93, P<0. 05), increase the diagnosis rate of osteoporosis(RR=2. 24, 95% CI: 1. 74-2. 87, P<0. 05), and improve quality of life(SMD=10. 34, 95% CI: 7. 26-13. 42, P<0. 05). Conclusion FLS can help relieve pain in patients with fragility fractures, reduce the risk of secondary fractures, reduce mortality, increase the diagnosis rate of osteoporosis in patients with fragility fractures, and improve the overall quality of life of patients.
[1]王恬,陆海英.《老年髋部脆性骨折病人照护最佳实践标准》要点解读[J].护理研究,2020,34(7):1295-1299.
[2]汤昱暄,梁小芹,于明明.抗阻运动改善老年骨质疏松性骨折患者健康结局的Meta分析[J].中华护理杂志,2023,58(10):1238-1244.
[3]何玉莲,潘荣佳,彭逸思,等.老年髋部脆性骨折病人二次骨折预防与管理最佳证据总结[J].循证护理,2024,10(1):20-25.
[4]沈晓青,张伟,王晶晶.骨折联络服务中骨科专科护士联络员的概念分析[J].护士进修杂志,2024,39(11):1127-1131.
[5]周茜茜,饶建伟,徐江保,等.骨折联络服务在骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折风险预测模型中的应用[J].中医药管理杂志,2023,31(20):135-138.
[6]熊静,黄冬梅,仇珍珍. FLS模式护理对老年股骨颈骨折手术患者肢体功能康复的影响[J].护理实践与研究,2023,20(7):1081-1085.
[7]徐青,周佩敏,余冰,等.骨折联络服务干预策略在脊柱脆性骨折患者术后护理中的应用效果[J].中国医药导报,2023,20(7):181-184.
[8]李珊珊,曹向军,谭小欣.骨折联络服务应用于骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折行PVP术患者中的效果[J].中国药物滥用防治杂志,2023,29(6):990-994.
[9]孟蓓毅,许斌,冯立,等.基于骨折联络服务的老年髋部脆性骨折患者综合干预作用分析[J].浙江创伤外科,2023,28(3):605-607.
[10]孟露,刘福尧,韩杉,等.老年股骨脆性骨折患者基于骨折联络服务模式的出院计划干预研究[J].护理学杂志,2023,38(17):1-4.
[11]蒋璟峰,来贺欢,陈静,等.骨折联络服务模式预防老年髋部脆性骨折患者发生二次骨折效果观察[J].中国基层医药,2023,30(1):148-151.
[12]胡毓敏,赵一琼.骨折联络服务模式应用于老年股骨颈骨折行全髋置换病人的效果观察[J].全科护理,2022,20(11):1529-1531.
[13]李通宪,高峰,杨建波,等.骨折联络服务在骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折经皮椎体成形术后的应用[J].河北医药,2022,44(10):1512-1515.
[14]谭小翠,屠海霞,张兴,等.老年骨质疏松性椎骨压缩性骨折联络服务[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2022,30(22):2104-2106.
[15]陈勉珊,郑倍奋,黄秋娜,等.基于FLS模式的康复护理在骨质疏松性股骨转子间骨折手术患者中的应用[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2021,27(18):105-107.
[16]丛珊,李思,李倩,等.髋部脆性骨折老年患者实施骨折联络服务效果观察[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2021,27(14):69-71.
[17]朱玉燕,潘杏华,赵丽君.老年髋部脆性骨折患者实施骨折联络服务效果分析[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2020,26(16):100-103.
[18]陈雪莲,孙慧娟,黎芬芬.基于FLS模式的康复护理在OVCF患者中的应用[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2019,25(14):32-34.
[19]刘春香,成传芳,赵晨,等.骨折联络服务在老年髋部脆性骨折患者中的应用[J].中华护理杂志,2019,54(9):1343-1348.
[20] OSAKI M, OKUDA R, SAEKI Y, et al. Efficiency of coordinator-based osteoporosis intervention in fragility fracture patients:a prospective randomized trial[J]. Osteoporos Int, 2021,32(3):495-503.
[21]甘玉云,刘静,徐丽,等.基于骨折联络服务模式的老年髋部脆性骨折患者综合护理干预效果研究[J].解放军护理杂志,2021,38(67-70):67-70.
[22] LAI H, FAN J, LIU H, et al. Fracture liaison services combined with online home nursing care in fragility hip fracture:a comparative effectiveness pilot study[J]. Arch Osteoporos, 2023,18(1):33.
[23] YOSHINO Y, TANAKA S, OHAMA H, et al. Effectiveness of a Japanese multi-professional cooperative osteoporosis liaison service at a private hospital for decreasing secondary fractures in osteoporosis patients with fragility fractures[J]. Arch Osteoporos,2021,16(1):75.
[24] WASFIE T, JACKSON A, BROCK C, et al. Does a fracture liaison service program minimize recurrent fragility fractures in the elderly with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures[J]. Am J Surg, 2019,217(3):557-560.
[25] VRANKEN L, DE BRUIN I J A, DRIESSEN A H M, et al. Decreased mortality and subsequent fracture risk in patients with a major and hip fracture after the introduction of a fracture liaison service:a 3-year follow-up survey[J]. J Bone Miner Res, 2022,37(10):2025-2032.
[26] SANLI I, VAN HELDEN S H, BROEKE R H MTEN, et al. The role of the fracture liaison service(FLS)in subsequent fracture prevention in the extreme elderly[J]. Aging Clin Exp Res, 2019,31(8):1105-1111.
[27] AXELSSON K F, JACOBSSON R, LUND D, et al. Effectiveness of a minimal resource fracture liaison service[J]. Osteoporos Int, 2016,27(11):3165-3175.
[28] GONZáLEZ-QUEVEDO D, PéREZ-DEL-RíO V, MORIELGARCESO D, et al. A 2-year follow-up of a novel fracture liaison service:can we reduce the mortality in elderly hip fracture patients? A prospective cohort study[J]. Osteoporos Int, 2022,33(8):1695-1702.
[29] BACHOUR F, RIZKALLAH M, SEBAALY A, et al. Fracture liaison service:report on the first successful experience from the Middle East[J]. Arch Osteoporos, 2017,12(1):79.
[30]向青天,王通卫,王继军,等.骨折联络服务理念在老年骨质疏松性髋部骨折术后患者中的应用效果[J].临床医学研究与实践,2021,6(7):43-46.
基本信息:
中图分类号:R683
引用信息:
[1]汪苗苗,程溢芬,段文静,等.骨折联络服务对脆性骨折患者干预效果的系统评价[J].老年医学研究,2024,5(03):14-20.
2024-06-25
2024-06-25